Michael SWETT; David Fidanque; and the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Inc., Respondents on Review,
v.
Bill BRADBURY, Secretary of State; and the State of Oregon, Petitioners on Review, and
Virginia Markell; Laurence Perry; and Susan Remmers, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 24, 2003.
April 24, 2003.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Thomas M. Christ, of Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP, Portland, filed the petition for attorney fees for respondents on review.
Philip Schradle, Special Counsel to the Attorney General, Salem, filed the objection to petition for attorney fees for petitioners on review. With him on the objection were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.
Paul B. Gamson, of Smith, Gamson, Diamond & Olney, Portland, filed objections to the petition for attorney fees for respondents.
Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, RIGGS, De MUNIZ, and BALMER, Justices.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
GILLETTE, J.
This application for an award of attorney fees on review arises out of a successful challenge to the constitutionality of Ballot Measure 62 (1998).1See Swett v. Bradbury,333 Or. 597, 43 P.3d 1094 (2002) (declaring measure unconstitutional because it violated separate-vote requirement of Oregon Constitution). Respondents on review, plaintiffs below ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.