1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 251 F.Supp.2d
  5. 251 F.Supp.2d 166 (2003)
 

SHULMAN v. VOYOU, L.L.C

No. CIV.A.02-1295 (RMU).

251 F.Supp.2d 166 (2003)

John D. SHULMAN et al., Plaintiffs, v. VOYOU, L.L.C., Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

March 12, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Lichtenstein, Swidler, Berlin, Shereff & Friedman, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

Bernard E. Goodman, Gary & Goodman PLLC, Vienna, VA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION

A fundamental concept of contract law is pactu sunt servanda: promises should be kept. Perhaps Adam Smith put it best by stating:

Whoever offers to another a bargain of any kind, proposes to do this: Give me that which I want, and you shall have this which you want, is the meaning of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases