1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 8 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 381 (2003)
 

ESPINOZA v. CLASSIC PIZZA, INC.

No. G030406.

8 Cal.Rptr.3d 381 (2003)

114 Cal.App.4th 968

Pedro ESPINOZA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CLASSIC PIZZA, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

December 30, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ginez, Steinmetz & Associates, Rudy Ginez, Jr., and Paul W. Steinmetz, Santa Ana, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Law Offices of Thomas R. Nigro and Thomas R. Nigro, Santa Ana, for Defendants and Respondents.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

OPINION

RYLAARSDAM, J.

Plaintiff Pedro Espinoza appeals from a $13,517 judgment for overtime wages in his favor against defendant Classic Pizza, Inc. Owners of Classic Pizza, defendants Robert Blum (Robert) and Elaine Blum, were held to be jointly liable to the extent of $6,079. The court also awarded plaintiff $20,000 in attorney fees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases