PHILPOTT v. BERNALES


196 Misc.2d 117 (2003)

762 N.Y.S.2d 771

CHARLES PHILPOTT, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, ROSEANNE PHILPOTT, et al., Respondents, v. EDUARDO BERNALES et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

May 15, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leahey & Johnson, P.C., New York City (Peter James Johnson, Jr., of counsel), for appellants.

Simonson Hess & Leibowitz, P.C., New York City (Edward S. Goodman of counsel), for respondents.

PESCE, P.J., and ARONIN, J., concur; GOLIA, J., dissents in part and concurs in part in a separate memorandum.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

On the court's own motion, the appeals are consolidated for purposes of disposition.

Appeal from order entered March 1, 2002 dismissed. Although the motion is denominated as a motion to renew and reargue, it is, in substance, a motion to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (Roman v Konis, 254 A.D.2d 269 [1998]).

Order entered August 15, 2001 affirmed without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases