1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 320 F.3d
  5. 320 F.3d 1354 (2003)
 

PANDROL USA, v. AIRBOSS RY. PRODUCTS, INC.

Nos. 02-1067, 02-1355.

320 F.3d 1354 (2003)

PANDROL USA, LP and Pandrol Limited, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AIRBOSS RAILWAY PRODUCTS, INC., Airboss of America Corp., Robert M. Magnuson, and Jose R. Mediavilla, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 21, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen I. Rubenstein, Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman, P.C., of New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief was Raymond B. Churchill, Jr.

Richard R. Johnson, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., of Kansas City, MO, argued for defendants-appellants. Of counsel was Christopher P. Murphy, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, of Washington, DC.

Before CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge.

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Airboss Railway Products, Inc., Airboss of America Corp., Robert M. Magnuson, and Jose R. Mediavilla (collectively, "the defendants") appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Pandrol USA, LP v. Airboss Ry. Prods., No. 99-0182 (W.D.Mo. Mar. 28, 2002).

The district court entered summary judgment of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,110,046 ("the '046 patent") and found that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases