1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 823 A.2d
  5. 823 A.2d 782 (2003)
 

MULL v. ZETA CONSUMER PRODUCTS

823 A.2d 782 (2003)

176 N.J. 385

Lisa MULL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ZETA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, Defendant-Respondent, and Custom Machine Design, Inc. and XYZ Company, A Fictitious Name, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 22, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey D. Curzi argued the cause for appellant (Morrow and Curzi, attorneys).

Thomas A. Wester argued the cause for respondent (McDermott & McGee, attorneys; Keri Avellini, on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by VERNIERO, J.

The New Jersey Workers' Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-1 to -128 (the Act), provides the exclusive remedy for claims against an employer when a worker is injured on the job, except for those injuries that have resulted from the employer's "intentional wrong." N.J.S.A. 34:15-8. Under that exception, the worker may pursue a common-law remedy in the Law Division. The narrow issue before us is whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases