1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 265 F.Supp.2d
  5. 265 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2003)
 

ORENSHTEYN v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 02-60478-CIV.

265 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2003)

Alexander S. ORENSHTEYN, Plaintiff, v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division.

May 20, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy W. Johnson, David Fink, Fink & Johnson, Houston, TX, William Frank Gallese, Port St. Lucie, FL, for plaintiff.

Michael Ross Tein, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Miami, FL, Douglas J. Kline, John D. Lanza, Christina N. Smith, Gary Grossman, Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, Amanda J. Metts, Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, Boston, MA, for defendant.

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JORDAN, District Judge.

Alexander Orenshteyn sues Citrix Systems for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281. Citrix answered and interposed a counterclaim that Mr. Orenshteyn's patents were invalid. On March 6, 2003, Citrix filed a motion for summary judgment on the issues of noninfringement and invalidity. For the reasons set forth below, Citrix's motion for summary judgment [D.E. 123...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases