1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 262 F.Supp.2d
  5. 262 F.Supp.2d 1280 (2003)
 

ANDERSON v. DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC

No. CIV-01-1939-HE.

262 F.Supp.2d 1280 (2003)

Ralph ANDERSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dow AGROSCIENCES LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

May 14, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phil Watkins, Michael S. Miller, Phil Watkins, P.C., San Antonio, TX, Terry W. Tippens, Esquire, Jay P. Walters, Esquire, Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey & Tippens, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK, Counsel for Plaintiffs.

Dean T. Barnhard, Joseph G. Eaton, Larry A. Mackey, Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis, IN, Anton J. Rupert, Crowe & Dunlevy, Oklahoma City, Ok, Patrick M. Ryan, Ryan, Whaley, Hampton & Bomhoff, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK, Counsel for Defendant.

ORDER

HEATON, District Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs have responded in opposition to the motion. Upon review, the court determines defendant's motion should be granted in part and denied in part.1

Summary judgment is appropriate "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases