HULSE v. ARROW TRUCKING CO.

No. COA02-1750.

587 S.E.2d 898 (2003)

William F. HULSE, Guardian Ad Litem for Imogene Fowler Eckliff and Timothy Eckliff, Plaintiffs, v. ARROW TRUCKING CO. and Thomas Ray Fincher, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 18, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Knox, Brotherton, Knox & Godfrey, by H. Edward Knox, Lisa G. Godfrey, and Frances S. Knox, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellees.

Davis & Hamrick, L.L.P., by H. Lee Davis, Jr. and Ann C. Rowe, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellants.


HUNTER, Judge.

Thomas Fincher ("defendant Fincher") and Arrow Trucking Company ("defendant Arrow") (collectively "defendants") appeal the trial court's discovery order compelling the production of certain handwritten interrogatory responses. Defendants have failed to demonstrate that a substantial right will be affected should they not be given the immediate right to appeal. Therefore, we dismiss defendants' appeal as interlocutory.

On 21 May 2001, defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases