1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 823 A.2d
  5. 823 A.2d 626 (2003)
 

POLLOCK v. PATUXENT INSTITUTION BOARD OF REVIEW

No. 106, Sept. Term, 2002.

823 A.2d 626 (2003)

374 Md. 463

Michael POLLOCK, v. PATUXENT INSTITUTION BOARD OF REVIEW.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 8, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Gitomer (The Law Office of Mark Gitomer, on brief), Owings Mills, for petitioner/cross-respondent.

Andrew H. Baida, Solicitor General (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland and Scott S. Oakley, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), Baltimore, for respondent-cross-petitioner.

Argued before BELL, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, JJ.

CATHELL, Judge.

Since 1991 there has been recurring litigation between Michael Pollock, petitioner/cross-respondent (hereafter "petitioner") and the Patuxent Institution Board of Review, respondent/cross-petitioner (hereafter the "Board"). This is the second time a case between these parties has been before this Court. We granted certiorari in this appeal to decide whether positive urinalysis drug test results of a sample...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases