1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 281 F.Supp.2d
  5. 281 F.Supp.2d 1149 (2003)
 

REIFFIN v. MICROSOFT CORP.

No. C 98-266 VRW.

281 F.Supp.2d 1149 (2003)

Martin Gardner REIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

August 21, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Gardner Reiffin, Danville, CA, Pro se.

Norman H. Beamer, Fish & Neave, Palo Alto, CA, Jesse J. Jenner, Fish & Neave, New York City, for Martin Gardner Reiffin.

Thomas W. Burt, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, Eric L. Wesenberg, Terrence P. McMahon, William L. Anthony, Erin Farrell, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, Menlo Park, CA, J. Christopher Carraway, John D. Vandenberg, Joseph T. Jakubek, Klarquist, Sparkman, Campbell, Leigh & Whinston, LLP, Todd M. Siegel, Klarquist, Sparkman, Campbell, Leigh & Whinston, LLP, Portland, OR, for Microsoft Corporation.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

WALKER, District Judge.

Defendant has raised as a defense and filed a counter-claim alleging that, under the doctrine of prosecution laches, plaintiff should be barred from prosecuting his patent infringement claims against defendant due to the unreasonable and unexplained delay in the prosecution of plaintiff's applications that ultimately resulted in the issuance of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases