1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 257 F.Supp.2d
  5. 257 F.Supp.2d 1089 (2003)
 

BROCK v. UNITED GRINDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. C-3-00-541.

257 F.Supp.2d 1089 (2003)

William J. BROCK, Plaintiff, v. UNITED GRINDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

March 23, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Randolph Folkerth, Jr., Folkerth & Folkerth, PLL, Dayton, OH, for plaintiff.

Karl R. Ulrich, Toby K. Henderson, Sebaly Shillito & Dyer, Dayton, OH, Michael Gallagher, Gallager & Kaiser, LLP, Kansas City, MO, for defendants.

William Martin Slonaker, Kettering, OH, for mediator.

EXPANDED OPINION; DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #16); PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #27) OVERRULED; CONFERENCE CALL SET

RICE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff William Brock began working at United Grinding Technologies, Inc. ("UGT"), formerly known as Sheffield Machine Tool, in 1992.1 Beginning in 1995, Plaintiff held the position of Inventory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases