YATES v. HALFORD

No. S-10438.

73 P.3d 1236 (2003)

Robert L. YATES, Appellant, v. Richard W. HALFORD and VECO Corporation, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

July 18, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Brattain II, Baker Brattain LLC, Anchorage, for Appellant.

Thomas E. Williams, Keith A. Christenson, Eagle River, for Appellee Halford.

Todd J. Timmermans, Price & Price, Anchorage, for Appellee VECO Corporation.

Before: FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, BRYNER, and CARPENETI, Justices.


OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The question in this case is whether summary judgment was properly granted in favor of a party who had strictly foreclosed a land sale contract. We conclude that summary judgment was improper because the grounds relied on by the movant were both factually disputed and legally insufficient and the movant failed to show that he was entitled to strict foreclosure as a matter of law.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases