1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 78 P.3d
  5. 78 P.3d 1056 (2003)
 

CITY OF TUCSON v. CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR

No. 2 CA-CV 2002-0183.

78 P.3d 1056 (2003)

206 Ariz. 335

CITY OF TUCSON, an Arizona municipal corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

October 31, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. House, Tucson City Attorney by Frank William Kern, III, Tucson, Ulrich & Anger, P.C. by Paul G. Ulrich, Phoenix, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Munger Chadwick, P.L.C. by John F. Munger and Evelyn Patrick Rick, Tucson, for Defendant/Appellee.

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 The City of Tucson appeals a summary judgment in favor of Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., in the City's action seeking to enforce its ordinances against nonconforming billboard structures. The City argues the trial court erred in retroactively applying the two-year statute of limitations in A.R.S. § 9-462.02(C) to bar the majority of its enforcement claims against Clear Channel for violating the City's sign...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases