1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 272 F.Supp.2d
  5. 272 F.Supp.2d 772 (2003)
 

GLAXO GROUP LTD. v. APOTEX, INC.

No. 00 C 5791.

272 F.Supp.2d 772 (2003)

GLAXO GROUP LIMITED, and Smithkline Beecham Corp., Plaintiff, v. APOTEX, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

July 22, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher S. Pennisi, Michael F. Hurley, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, New York City, Dean Scott Rauchwerger, James F. Smith, Joshua Avinoam Aldort, Clausen Miller P.C., Chicago, IL, Stephen B. Judlowe, Dennis J. Mondolino, Janet B. Linn, Jason A. Lief, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP, New York City, for Glaxo Group Ltd, Smithkline Beecham Corporation, plaintiffs.

Hugh L. Moore, Scott B. Feder, Keith D. Parr, Paul J. Molino, William Andrew Rakoczy, Hugh Scott Balsam, Lord, Bissell & Brook, Chicago, IL, for Apotex, Inc., defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETTLEMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Glaxo Group Limited and SmithKline Beecham Corp. ("plaintiff") sued defendant Apotex, Inc. for a declaration of infringement of patent Nos. 4,562,181 and 4,820,832, and defendant counterclaimed for invalidity. After a lengthy bench trial, the court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in plaintiff's favor, concluding that defendant's proposed generic cefuroxime axetil product...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases