1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 255 F.Supp.2d
  5. 255 F.Supp.2d 779 (2003)
 

U.S. v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

No. C-3-99-093.

255 F.Supp.2d 779 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

March 6, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pamela M. Stanek, Dale Ann Goldberg, United States Attorney's Office—3, Dayton, OH, David Sadoff, U.S. Department of Justice, Michael F. Hertz, Stephen D. Altman, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for USA, plaintiff.

James H. Greer, Bieser, Greer & Landis—3, David Carr Greer, Bieser, Greer & Landis—3, Dayton, OH, Peter B. Work, David Z. Bodenheimer, Brian C. Elmer, Richard L. Beizer, Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC, for United Technologies, defendant.

ENTRY AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT UNITED TECHNOLGIES CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS. (DOC. 134).

ROSE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for decision on Defendant United Technologies Corporation's Motion for Reconsideration of its Summary Judgment Motions. (Doc. 134). As the instant case involves the Pratt & Whitney division of United Technologies, the Court will refer to the defendant as "United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases