1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 264 Conn.
  5. 264 Conn. 737 (2003)
 

AMMIRATA v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

(SC 16614).

264 Conn. 737 (2003)

MICHAEL AMMIRATA ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF REDDING ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released July 22, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul L. Bollo, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Peter S. Olson, with whom, on the brief, was Michael N. LaVelle, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

Borden, Norcott, Katz, Palmer and Zarella, Js.

Opinion

PALMER, J.

The sole issue presented in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the record was inadequate to review the claims of the plaintiffs, Michael Ammirata and Margaret Ammirata, that principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel precluded the named defendant,1 the zoning board of appeals of the town of Redding (board), from litigating claims or issues regarding the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases