PETERSEN v. FIELDER

16-98-11043; A106971.

58 P.3d 841 (2002)

185 Or.App. 164

Ronald W. PETERSEN and Simone L.R. Petersen, Respondents, v. Danni W. FIELDER and Rhonda L. Fielder, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 27, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nickolas Facaros, Eugene, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the opening brief was Facaros Dugan Rosas. With him on the reply brief was Facaros & Dugan.

George Kelly argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and Van HOOMISSEN, Senior Judge.


ARMSTRONG, J.

Defendants appeal from a supplemental judgment that awarded plaintiffs attorney fees and costs in their action to recover the balance of the purchase price of real property. We conclude that the trial court did not err in making that award and affirm.

The facts are largely undisputed. In 1997, plaintiffs sold their residence and acreage to defendants for $175,000. As consideration for $15,000 of the purchase price, defendants agreed to perform...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases