1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 214 F.Supp.2d
  5. 214 F.Supp.2d 581 (2002)
 

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM v. EXCEL PHARMACEUTICALS

No. 2:02-CV-51.

214 F.Supp.2d 581 (2002)

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP., d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, Plaintiff, v. EXCEL PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division.

August 2, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kristan B. Burch, Stephen E. Noona, Kaufman & Canoles, PC, Norfolk, VA, Gregory S. Lewis, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, McLean, VA, for Plaintiff.

Walter D. Kelley, Jr., Michael E. Anderson, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Norfolk, VA, Madison Jellins, William G. Gaede, III, Cooley Godward, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Jonathan G. Graves, Cooley Godward, LLP, Reston, VA, for Defendant.

OPINION

REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on defendant's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the reasons set forth below, defendant's motion is GRANTED.

I. Factual and Procedural History

Plaintiff SmithKline Beecham Corp., d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline ("Glaxo"), holds U.S. Patent No. 5,427,798 ("the '798 patent") on sustained-release...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases