1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 193 F.Supp.2d
  5. 193 F.Supp.2d 519 (2002)
 

IMME v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.

No. Civ. 301CV00705AWT.

193 F.Supp.2d 519 (2002)

Bryan H. IMME, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

April 2, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark D. Soycher, Rebecca M. Vicente, Law Office of Mark D. Soycher, Bloomfield, CT, for Plaintiff.

James M. Sconzo, Halloran & Sage, Hartford, CT, Wade A. Forsman, Michele L. Fowler, Carl K. Morrison, Federal Express Corp., Legal Dept.-Litigation, Memphis, TN, for Defendant.

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THOMPSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Bryan H. Imme ("Imme") brought this action claiming that the defendant, Federal Express Corporation ("FedEx"), violated Section 31-51x of the Connecticut General Statutes by terminating his employment after he refused to take a drug test when directed to do so. The defendant has moved for summary judgment, contending that it had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases