1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 179 F.Supp.2d
  5. 179 F.Supp.2d 523 (2002)
 

U.S. v. LLERA PLAZA

No. CR. A. 98-362-10.

179 F.Supp.2d 523 (2002)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Carlos Ivan LLERA PLAZA, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

January 9, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jules Epstein, Kairys & Rudovsky, Philadelphia, PA, Jose A. Muniz, New York City, Timothy J. Sullivan, Sullivan & Sullivan, College Park, MD, for defendant.

Thomas R. Perricone, U.S. Attorney's Office, David H. Resnicoff, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for U.S.

OPINION

POLLAK, District Judge.

On August 24, 2001, defendant Carlos Ivan Llera Plaza filed a motion to exclude from his forthcoming trial certain evidence which the government has indicated its intention to prove. He has articulated arguments for the exclusion of this evidence pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403. The government has contested the motion in its Trial Memorandum. Because the evidence in question does not constitute "other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases