1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 210 F.Supp.2d
  5. 210 F.Supp.2d 407 (2002)
 

CHICAGO INS. CO. v. KREITZER & VOGELMAN

No. 97 Civ. 8619(RWS).

210 F.Supp.2d 407 (2002)

CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. KREITZER & VOGELMAN, David M. Kreitzer, Donald H. Vogelman, Daniel W. Pariser and Pariser & Vogelman, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

As Amended July 17, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steinberg & Cavaliere, White Plains, NY by Kevin F. Cavaliere, of counsel, for Plaintiff.

James E. Musurca, Kreitzer & Vogelman and David M. Kreitzer, c/o Babchik & Young, White Plains, NY, Donald H. Vogelman, New York City, Daniel Pariser, Pariser & Vogelman, New York City, for Defendant.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Chicago Insurance Company ("CIC") has moved for the second time, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment declaring the propriety of its rescission of several lawyers' professional responsibility policies (the "Policies"). It also moves to dismiss the claim of defendants Kreitzer & Vogelman ("K & V") and David M. Kreitzer ("Kreitzer") that CIC has waived its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases