1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 217 F.Supp.2d
  5. 217 F.Supp.2d 399 (2002)
 

BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS v. PRODIGY COMMUNS.

No. 00 Civ. 9451(CM).

217 F.Supp.2d 399 (2002)

BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC, Plaintiff, v. PRODIGY COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 22, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert J. Breneisen, Benjamin Hershkowitz, Robert F. Perry, Edward J. Handler, Kenyon & Kenyon, New York City, for Plaintiff.

James I. Serota, Vinson & Elkins, LLP, New York City, Willem G. Schuurman, Andrew G. DiNovo, David B. Weaver, Avelyn Ross, David E. Killough, Vinson & Elkins, LLP, Austin, TX, for Defendant.

DECISION AND ORDER

MCMAHON, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff British Telecommunications ("BT") asserts that Defendant Prodigy Communications Corp. ("Prodigy"), through its business activities as an Internet Service Provider ("ISP"), directly infringes claims 3, 5, 6, and 7 (the "Asserted Claims") of U.S. Patent No. 4,873,662 (the "Sargent Patent" or "'662 Patent"). BT also alleges that Prodigy induces and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases