1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 239 F.Supp.2d
  5. 239 F.Supp.2d 332 (2002)
 

LEWIS TREE SERVICE, INC. v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. 99 Civ. 8556 (JGK).

239 F.Supp.2d 332 (2002)

LEWIS TREE SERVICE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 20, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russel H. Beatie, Jr., Beatie & Osborn, New York City, for Lewis Tree Service, Ironman Magazine.

Christopher H. Harris, James E. Tyrell, Jr., Hugh L. Burns, Latham & Watkins, New York City, James E. Hopkins, Scott Louis Weber, Latham & Watkins, Newark, NJ, for Lucent Tech. Inc. and AT&T Corp.

OPINION AND ORDER

KOELTL, District Judge.

This is a purported class action brought by Lewis Tree Service, Inc. ("Lewis Tree")and Ironman Magazine ("Ironman") (collectively the "plaintiffs") against AT & T Corporation (AT & T) and AT & T's successor, Lucent Technologies, Inc. ("Lucent") (collectively the "defendants") on behalf of purchasers of various telecommunications equipment sold by the defendants. The plaintiffs in their Third Amended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases