1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 188 F.Supp.2d
  5. 188 F.Supp.2d 286 (2002)
 

DITTMER v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK

No. 96-CV-2206(TCP)(ARL).

188 F.Supp.2d 286 (2002)

Henry DITTMER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

February 21, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Madeline Shelia Galvin, Galvin & Morgan, James E. Morgan, Delmar, NY, for Plaintiffs.

John J. Sipos, State of New York Office of the Attorney General, Assistant Attorney General New York State Department of Law, Albany, NY, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PLATT, District Judge.

Defendants County of Suffolk, et al. ("Suffolk") move pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment of Plaintiffs' Henry Dittmer's, et al.'s ("Dittmer") facial Equal Protection challenge. Dittmer cross-moves for summary judgment of that claim. Both parties have filed statements of material fact for which they feel there is no genuine issue for trial pursuant to Local...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases