TOWN OF SECAUCUS v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY


20 N.J. Tax 384 (2002)

TOWN OF SECAUCUS, PLAINTIFF, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY AND 101 HUDSON STREET ASSOCIATES C/O LINPRO CO., DEFENDANTS.

Tax Court of New Jersey.

December 5, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Tannenbaum, for plaintiff (Zipp and Tannenbaum, L.L.C., attorneys).

Robert J. Cirafesi, for defendant City of Jersey City (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys).

Paul Hanlon, for defendant 101 Hudson Street (Schumann, Hanlon, Doherty, McCrossin & Paolino, attorneys).


KUSKIN, J.T.C.

Plaintiff, Town of Secaucus, challenges property tax exemptions for tax years 1998 and 1999 granted under the Fox-Lance Law, N.J.S.A. 40:55C-40 to -76, by the City of Jersey City to defendant 101 Hudson Street Associates (properly named 101 Hudson Urban Renewal Associates and hereinafter referred to as "Hudson Urban Renewal") with respect to a forty story office building and related improvements located at 101 Hudson Street, Jersey City (the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases