1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 211 F.Supp.2d
  5. 211 F.Supp.2d 144 (2002)
 

ARNOLD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. Civ.A. 01-1327(RCL).

211 F.Supp.2d 144 (2002)

James E. ARNOLD, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

July 19, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Arnold, Terre Haute United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, IN, plaintiff pro se.

Michelle A. Arcari, Office of Corporation Counsel, District of Columbia, Washington, DC, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

Now before the Court is defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Specifically, defendants contend that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because plaintiff's claims, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, are time-barred by the District of Columbia statute of limitations, and that even...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases