1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 52 P.3d
  5. 52 P.3d 205 (2002)
 

SMITH v. CIGNA HEALTHPLAN OF ARIZONA

No. 2 CA-CV 2001-0125.

52 P.3d 205 (2002)

203 Ariz. 173

Sandra SMITH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CIGNA HEALTHPLAN OF ARIZONA, an Arizona Corporation; Mitchell Hall and Jane Doe Hall, husband and wife; and Gilbert Burkel and Jane Doe Burkel, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two.

July 30, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raven & Awerkamp, P.C., By Don Awerkamp, Tucson, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Titus, Brueckner & Berry, P.C., By John R. Tellier, Scottsdale, for Defendants/Appellees CIGNA and Burkel.

Mesch, Clark & Rothschild, P.C., By Alan N. Ariav, Tucson, for Defendants/Appellees Hall.

OPINION

HOWARD, J.

¶ 1 Appellant Sandra Smith, M.D., sued appellees, CIGNA HealthPlan of Arizona, Mitchell Hall, and Gilbert Burkel (collectively, "CIGNA") for tortious interference with her employment and wrongful discharge. The trial court granted CIGNA's motion for summary judgment, concluding that Smith's claim was preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 141 through 187 (the Act). Smith appeals that ruling. Because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases