1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 833 So.2d
  5. 833 So.2d 801 (2002)
 

SOUTHERN DIAGNOSTIC ASSOCIATES v. BENCOSME

No. 3D02-886.

833 So.2d 801 (2002)

SOUTHERN DIAGNOSTIC ASSOCIATES, Petitioner, v. Luz BENCOSME, et al., Respondents.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 30, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hengber & Goldstein, P.A., and Frank S. Goldstein (Fort Lauderdale); Bunnell, Woulfe, Kirschbaum, Keller, McIntyre & Gregoire, P.A., and Nancy W. Gregoire (Fort Lauderdale), for petitioner.

Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin, P.A., and Stephen A. Marino, Jr., Miami, and Christine A. Gudaitis, Hallandale, for respondent Bencosme.

Before JORGENSON, COPE, and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Southern Diagnostic Associates, Inc., (Southern Diagnostic) a non-party, seeks certiorari review of an order compelling discovery of certain contents of its computer system. For the following reasons, we grant the petition and quash the order.

Bencosme sued United Automobile Insurance Company (United Auto) alleging statutory bad faith for United Auto's alleged failure to conduct a reasonable investigation of her PIP claim. During discovery, Bencosme...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases