1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 773 N.E.2d
  5. 773 N.E.2d 829 (2002)
 

CITY OF VINCENNES v. PETHTEL

No. 42A04-0202-CV-94.

773 N.E.2d 829 (2002)

The CITY OF VINCENNES, Appellant-Defendant, v. Holly PETHTEL, Appellee-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

August 6, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rabb Emison, Emison, Doolittle, Kolb & Roellgen, Vincennes, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

David L. Miller, Lewis & Miller, Matt Parmenter, Sturm, Smith & Parmenter, Vincennes, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, the City of Vincennes (the City), appeals the trial court's denial of its Motion to Dismiss.

We affirm.

ISSUE

The City raises one (1) issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: whether the trial court erred in denying its Motion to Dismiss.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases