1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 228 F.Supp.2d
  5. 228 F.Supp.2d 1271 (2002)
 

SHEEHAN PIPELINE CONST. v. LANEY DIRECT. DRILLING

No. 02-CV-381-B(J).

228 F.Supp.2d 1271 (2002)

SHEEHAN PIPE LINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LANEY DIRECTIONAL DRILLING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma.

October 23, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard I. Pataki, Young H. Pei, Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson, Tulsa, OK, for Sheehan Pipe Line Construction Company, An Oklahoma Partnership.

James Rouse Hicks, Mark A. Craige, Morrel, West, Saffa, Craige & Hicks, Inc., Tulsa, OK, for Laney Directional Drilling Co., a Corporation.

ORDER1

JOYNER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Now before the Court is Laney Directional Drilling Company's ("Laney") Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), for lack of personal jurisdiction. Doc. No. 4. In the alternative, Defendant Laney asserts that a contract was formed by the parties' conduct and that an arbitration clause requires all disputes to be resolved in Houston, Texas. Doc. No. 4. After...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases