1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 793 A.2d
  5. 793 A.2d 645 (2002)
 

IN RE BRESLIN

793 A.2d 645 (2002)

171 N.J. 235

In the Matter of James A. BRESLIN, Jr., an Attorney at Law.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Reargued February 25, 2002.

Decided March 28, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Engelhardt, Assistant Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Michael P. Ambrosio, Newark, argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

For a lawyer, a judgment of disbarment is the ultimate professional sanction. Because in New Jersey disbarment invariably is permanent, a disbarred lawyer cannot ever again expect to practice his chosen profession. The enormity of that consequence has caused the members of this Court to treat disbarment matters with exceptional care and meticulous scrutiny.

The members of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases