1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 49 P.3d
  5. 49 P.3d 91 (2002)
 

IN RE DAVENPORT

(OSB 97-138; SC S47245)

49 P.3d 91 (2002)

334 Or. 298

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF John P. DAVENPORT, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided June 27, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey D. Sapiro, Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the request for review, briefs, and additional authorities for the Oregon State Bar.

Marc D. Blackman, Portland, argued the cause for the accused. With him on the brief and additional authorities was Ransom Blackman LLP, Portland.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, LEESON, and RIGGS, Justices.

PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (the Bar) alleged that lawyer John P. Davenport (the accused) knowingly made several false statements under oath and repeatedly asserted the lawyer-client privilege when he knew that it did not apply, thereby violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); DR 7-102(A)(5) (knowingly making false...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases