1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 535 U.S.
  5. 535 U.S. 826 (2002)
 

HOLMES GROUP, INC. v. VORNADO AIR CIRCULATION SYSTEMS, INC.

No. 01-408.

535 U.S. 826 (2002)

122 S.Ct. 1889

153 L.Ed.2d 13

HOLMES GROUP, INC. v. VORNADO AIR CIRCULATION SYSTEMS, INC.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 3, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James W. Dabney argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Paul Izzo, Timothy P. Gallogly, Arthur R. Miller, Marcia H. Sundeen, and Carol M. Wilhelm.

Peter W. Gowdey argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Christopher P. Murphy, Janine A. Carlan, Kenneth W. Starr, and Daryl L. Joseffer.*

Justice Scalia, delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this case, we address whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has appellate jurisdiction over a case in which the complaint does not allege a claim arising under federal patent law, but the answer contains a patent-law counterclaim.

I

Respondent, Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc., is a manufacturer of patented fans and heaters. In late 1992,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases