1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 242 F.Supp.2d
  5. 242 F.Supp.2d 1000 (2002)
 

DIGITAL CONTROL INC. v. McLAUGHLIN MFG. CO., INC.

No. C01-985P.

242 F.Supp.2d 1000 (2002)

DIGITAL CONTROL INCORPORATED, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, v. McLAUGHLIN MANUFACTURING CO., INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, At Seattle.

December 20, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul T. Meiklejohn, Brian C. Park, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Seattle, WA, Aaron Keyt, Renton, WA, for Plaintiff.

Stuart R. Dunwoody, Bruce A. Kaser, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, Steven E. farrar, Leatherwood Walker Todd & Mann, PC, Greenville, SC, for Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON 35 U.S.C. § 112 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

PECHMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment on Defendant's affirmative defenses under 35 U.S.C. § 112, which state that Plaintiff has failed to disclose the invention and state definite claims in the patents at issue. (Dkt. No. 130.) Plaintiff also protests that Defendant failed to reveal the substance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases