1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 259 Wis.2d
  5. 259 Wis.2d 833 (2002)
 

STATE v. KOENIG

No. 02-1076-CR.

259 Wis.2d 833 (2002)

2003 WI App 12

656 N.W.2d 499

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Cheryl A. KOENIG, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided December 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Patrick Flanagan, of Flanagan Law Office, L.L.C., of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Lara M. Herman, assistant attorney general.

Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ.

¶ 1. NETTESHEIM, P.J.

Cheryl A. Koenig appeals from an order denying her motion to rescind a condition of her extended supervision that requires her to introduce any person she is "dating" to her supervising agent. Koenig argues that the ambiguity of the term "dating" renders the condition unconstitutionally vague. We disagree. We conclude that the statutory definition of "dating relationship" as set out in WIS. STAT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases