1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 182 F.Supp.2d
  5. 182 F.Supp.2d 902 (2002)
 

TING v. AT & T

No. C 01-02969 BZ.

182 F.Supp.2d 902 (2002)

Darcy TING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AT & T, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

January 15, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Sturdevant, Karen L. Hindin, Sturdevant Law Firm, San Francisco, CA, F. Paul Bland, Jr., Arthur H. Bryant, Michael J. Quirk, Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Mark E. Haddad, Bradley H. Ellis, Steven M. Bierman, Catherine Valerio Barrad, Dorothy M. Robins, Peter I. Ostroff, Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, Los Angeles, CA, Howard Spierer, AT & T, Basking Ridge, NJ, for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ZIMMERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

In this action, defendant American Telephone and Telegraph Company ("AT & T") is being sued by its California customers for attempting to impose a new contract containing provisions which allegedly violate California contract and consumer protection laws.1 The complaint was filed in Alameda County Superior Court the day before the new contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases