1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 229 F.Supp.2d
  5. 229 F.Supp.2d 839 (2002)
 

HUMMEL v. CITY OF CARLISLE

No. C-3-00-539.

229 F.Supp.2d 839 (2002)

Richard HUMMEL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CARLISLE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

September 23, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey Michael Silverstein, Jeffrey M. Silverstein & Associates, Dayton, OH, for Plaintiff.

Daniel Paul Whitehead, Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Teetor, Columbus, OH, John T. McLandrich, Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., LPA, Cleveland, OH, Dianna M. Anelli, Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder, Co., LPA, Columbus, OH, Lynne K. Schoenling, Curry, Roby & Schoenling, Co., LLC, Columbus, OH, David A. Goldstein, Westerville, OH, for Defendants.

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 13); PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM DATE, CLEARLY STATING "USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE" AS A BASIS FOR HIS FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

RICE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Richard Hummel filed the underlying suit against Defendants City of Carlisle ("the City" or "Carlisle") and Carlisle Police Officers Chad Allen, Douglas Lanier...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases