1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 208 F.Supp.2d
  5. 208 F.Supp.2d 855 (2002)
 

JINDAL v. D.O.C. OPTICS CORP.

No. 3:01 CV 7518.

208 F.Supp.2d 855 (2002)

Neerja JINDAL, O.D., Plaintiff, v. D.O.C. OPTICS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division.

May 2, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Franklin, Law Office of John D. Franklin, Toledo, OH, for Neerja Jindal, O.D., Plaintiff.

John T Landwehr, Margaret Mattimoe Sturgeon, Eastman & Smith, Toledo, OH, for D.O.C. Optics Corporation, Patrick Henry, c/o D.O.C. Eyeworld-Store # 178, Defendants.

ORDER

CARR, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action against D.O.C. Optics Corporation ("D.O.C.") and Dr. Patrick Wcislak based on a failed business relationship. Following discovery, defendants removed this action from the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Pending is plaintiff's opposition to removal— which this court will treat as a motion for remand. For the following reasons, plaintiff's motion is granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases