1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 229 F.Supp.2d
  5. 229 F.Supp.2d 772 (2002)
 

MICHIGAN PORK PRODUCERS v. CAMPAIGN FOR FAMILY

Case No. 1:01-CV-34.

229 F.Supp.2d 772 (2002)

MICHIGAN PORK PRODUCERS, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors/Cross-Defendants, v. CAMPAIGN FOR FAMILY FARMS, et al., Defendants/Intervenors/Cross-Plaintiffs, v. Ann Veneman, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, et al., Cross-Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

October 25, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Charles Timmons, Troy W. Haney, John R. Kramer and Edward M. Mansfield, Grand Rapids, MI, for Plaintiffs/Intervenors/Cross-Defendants.

Susan E. Stokes, David R. Moeller and Christopher M. Bzdok, Traverse City, MI, for Defendants/Intervenors/Cross-Plaintiffs.

W. Francesca Ferguson, Thomas Millet and Carolyn McKee, Washington, DC, for Cross-Defendants.

OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

"[T]o compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Act for Establishment of Religious Freedom (1786), codified at Va.Code Ann. § 57-1 (Miche 2002).

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendants/Interveners/Cross-Plaintiffs Campaign for Family Farms ("CFF") and its named...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases