1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 114 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 114 Cal.Rptr.2d 881 (2001)
 

BURNS v. NATURE'S BEST

No. G023339.

114 Cal.Rptr.2d 881 (2001)

94 Cal.App.4th 1203

Charles BURNS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NATURE'S BEST et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Review Granted May 1, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Latham & Watkins, Jon D. Anderson, Costa Mesa, Julie V. King, and Neil G. Kenduck, Santa Ana, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Wood, Bohm & Francis, Lee A. Wood, Bohm, Francis, Kegel & Aguilera and James G. Bohm, Irvine, for Defendants and Appellants.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

This case requires us to consider the definition of "confidential communication" under section 632 of California Privacy Act (Pen.Code, § 630 et seq.)1 Because we determine the trial court incorrectly followed Coulter v. Bank of America (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 923, 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 766, we reverse the judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases