1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 282 A.D.2d
  5. 282 A.D.2d 665 (2001)
 

ROMERO v. KARAVIDAS

282 A.D.2d 665 (2001)

723 N.Y.S.2d 412

JULIE ROMERO et al., Respondents, v. THEOCHARIS J. KARAVIDAS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided April 23, 2001.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, it cannot be said that "there is simply no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational [persons] to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented at trial" (Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499). The injured plaintiff established, through expert medical testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases