1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 282 A.D.2d
  5. 282 A.D.2d 664 (2001)
 

ROKICKI v. 24 HOUR COURIER SERVICE, INC.

282 A.D.2d 664 (2001)

723 N.Y.S.2d 411

MARY ROKICKI et al., Respondents, v. 24 HOUR COURIER SERVICE, INC., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided April 23, 2001.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence adduced at the hearing established that, under the circumstances, the plaintiffs' process server acted reasonably and with due diligence, and that service was effected in a manner calculated to give the appellant fair notice (see, CPLR 311 [a] [1]; Fashion Page v Zurich Ins. Co., 50 N.Y.2d 265; Eastman Kodak Co. v Miller & Miller Consulting Actuaries...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases