Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of his motion which was to suppress identification testimony. The evidence at the suppression hearing established that the police had a reasonable suspicion to detain the defendant and the two codefendants, who fit the general description of the three men who robbed the complainant and who were found near the crime scene shortly after the crime...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.