Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The photographic identification procedure used by the police was proper and did not taint the subsequent in-court identification of the defendant by the complainant. The photographic array was carefully assembled and the entire procedure was performed so as to minimize the risk of mistaken identification (see, People v Chipp,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.