Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 18, 2000, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated February 17, 2000, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.
The appellant's motion, denominated as one for leave to reargue and renew, was, in actuality, one for leave to reargue because...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.