Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The property which the Supreme Court considered for equitable distribution consisted of the plaintiff's varying interests in real estate corporations and partnerships. The plaintiff's interests in these assets ranged from 18% to 50%. The plaintiff contends that the Supreme Court erred when it did not apply a discount factor in determining the true market value of his various interests.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.