Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, there is no evidence that his arraignment on an unrelated crime was intentionally delayed solely for the purpose of questioning him in this case in violation of his right to counsel (see, People v Ortlieb,
The defendant's sentence was not excessive...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.