Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The incident underlying the defendant's conviction was the violation of the terms of a temporary order of protection issued pursuant to CPL 530.13 (1) (b). Contrary to the defendant's contention, under the circumstances of this case, the designation of the protected parties in the order was sufficiently specific to comply with the statute (see, CPL 530.13 [1] [b]).
The defendant's remaining contention is...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.