1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 178 F.Supp.2d
  5. 178 F.Supp.2d 658 (2001)
 

U.S. v. MODI

No. 1:01CR00050.

178 F.Supp.2d 658 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Vinodchandra MODI, etc., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division.

December 28, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rick A. Mountcastle and Ruth E. Plagenhoef, Assistant United States Attorneys, Abingdon, VA, for United States of America; Wyatt B. Durrette, Jr., Durrette, Irvin & Bradshaw, PLC, Richmond, VA, and Daniel K. Read, Jessee & Read, P.C., Abingdon, VA, for Defendant Vinod Modi.

John B. Russell, Jr., Becker, Russell & Becker, Midlothian, VA, for Defendant Kailas Modi.

OPINION AND ORDER

JONES, District Judge.

The question presented is the extent of the government's ability to restrain assets of the defendants prior to trial under the racketeering and money laundering criminal forfeiture statutes. Because I find that the scope of the government's pretrial restraint is excessive, I will partially grant the defendants' motion to modify the protective order previously entered.

I

The defendants, Vinodchandra...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases